US Army might ‘waste’ as much as $22b on Microsoft HoloLens • The Register

The US Army might find yourself losing a lot as $22 billion in taxpayer money if troopers aren’t truly taken with utilizing, or in a position to make use of as meant, the Microsoft HoloLens headsets it stated it will buy, a authorities watchdog has warned. 

In 2018, the American navy splashed $480 million on 100,000 prototype augmented-reality goggles from Redmond to see how they might assist troopers practice for and combat in fight. The Integrated Visual Augmentation System (IVAS) venture was expanded when the Army determined it needed the Windows large to make customized, battle-ready AR headsets in a ten-year deal price as much as $22 billion

The venture was delayed and is reportedly scheduled to roll out a while this 12 months. But the US Dept of Defense’s Office of the Inspector General (OIG) solid some doubt on whether or not it was price it in any respect.

“Procuring IVAS without attaining user acceptance could result in wasting up to $21.88 billion in taxpayer funds to field a system that soldiers may not want to use or use as intended,” the Pentagon oversight physique wrote in an audit [PDF] report this month.

In different phrases, the Army hasn’t but totally decided if or how service members will discover these HoloLens headsets priceless within the discipline. Although the closely redacted report didn’t reveal troopers’ responses to the prototype testing, it stated suggestions from surveys confirmed “both positive and negative user acceptance.”

US military personnel wearing a Microsoft HoloLens

Horror-lens .. Microsoft-supplied picture of a US soldier sporting its HoloLens-based headgear

The Army plans to buy 121,500 IVAS models from Microsoft whereas admitting that “if soldiers do not love IVAS and do not find it greatly enhances accomplishing the mission, then soldiers will not use it,” the report disclosed.

A Microsoft spokesperson advised The Register in a press release: “Our focus continues to be on developing IVAS to be a transformational platform that will deliver enhanced soldier safety and effectiveness.”

In a rebuttal to the OIG’s audit, Douglas Bush, assistant secretary of the Army for acquisition, logistics and expertise, stated the $21.88 billion was double what the navy would possible at most spend, and was – in a method – a worst-case state of affairs determine.

“This is a contract ceiling that includes all possible hardware, components, and services over a ten-year period at the worst possible pricing structure. Less than half of this total is possible for the US Army. This total includes all possible sales to all sister services, foreign military sales, and all maximized service contracts,” he wrote.

Bush insisted the Army has a coverage to ultimately take a look at and consider whether or not or not personnel will use tools comparable to Microsoft’s AR techno-specs. He additionally disagreed that speedy person acceptance was needed for figuring out whether or not the IVAS program can be worthwhile, and identified troopers didn’t like night-vision goggles once they had been launched within the Seventies. But over time, they turned extra skilled with the expertise advert developed techniques round it. Now, they’re extensively adopted by the Army. In different phrases: it is too early to inform for positive whether or not troopers will use the AR expertise or discover it helpful, in accordance with Bush.

Feedback can be subjective, Bush famous. Acceptance was influenced by a soldier’s degree of fatigue, climate circumstances, and familiarity with the tech.

However, “Army officials should have established user acceptance measurements at the beginning of the program to ensure that user needs were met,” the OIG argued.

“While we agree there is inherent tension between user acceptance and opportunity, having an established measurement or goal enables officials to know that close combat forces accept, want to use, and can function effectively with IVAS.”

In brief: earlier than you blow up billions on a venture like this, do some extra investigating. The US Army didn’t instantly reply to The Register‘s request for additional remark. ®

Source hyperlink

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.