Sports

Praful Patel’s Tenure As AIFF President Violates Sports Code: Sports Ministry Tells Supreme Court


Praful Patel has no mandate to proceed as All India Football Federation president as he has already served three phrases and the nationwide physique ought to maintain elections with out additional delay, the Sports Ministry has knowledgeable the Supreme Court. In an affidavit to the Supreme Court on April 8 in relation to a Special Leave Petition (SLP) filed by the AIFF, the sports activities ministry stated Patel’s tenure was in violation of the Sports Code. “…the term of existing committee (of AIFF) is already over, and the existing president (Praful Patel) has completed more than 12 years as president, the petitioner (AIFF) should hold elections without further delay as per extant instructions contained under Sports Code and the instructions issued by the Answering Respondent (sports ministry) from time to time,” the ministry’s affidavit stated.

“That thus the tenure of an office-bearer of the Petitioner, such as the president, who has already served 12 years as president of AIFF, will be in violation of the Sports Code, specifically clause 9.3 (iii) of the Sports Code read with the notification dated 01.05.2010.” Patel accomplished his three phrases and 12 years as AIFF president in December 2020, the utmost permitted to a nationwide sports activities federation (NSF) chief below the Sports Code.

The AIFF, nevertheless, didn’t maintain the elections, citing a pending petition within the Supreme Court relating to its structure.

The AIFF moved an software within the Supreme Court solely a month earlier than its elections have been due, looking for sure clarifications on the standing of its structure, which was below scrutiny within the Apex Court since 2017. The case continues to be pending.

The ministry additionally hinted that AIFF might lose its authorities recognition for not adhering to the sports activities code.

“As the last elections held by the petitioner was on 21.12.2016, as such the Petitioner is required to conduct fresh elections. While recently the Answering Respondent (sports ministry) renewed the Petitioner’s (AIFF) annual recognition for a year with effect from 23.10.2020, such recognition is subject to the outcome of the special leave petition pending before this honourable court.

“Furthermore, the Answering Respondent (sports activities ministry) of their renewal letter dated 23.10.2020 has categorically acknowledged that the Petitioner (AIFF) must carry their structure consistent with provisions of the Sports Code inside six months from the date of problem of the letter,” the ministry said in the affidavit.

In 2017, the Delhi High Court had set aside the election of Patel as AIFF president (in the 2016 AGM) on a petition by senior advocate Rahul Mehra.

But the Supreme Court had stayed the High Court decision, allowing Patel to continue in his role, while also appointing former Chief Election Commissioner of India S Y Quraishi and former national captain Bhaskar Ganguly as administrators and to formulate the AIFF constitution.

Patel has, however, said in the past that he cannot contest in any election of the AIFF but somehow the polls of the national federation have not been held.

Promoted

In February, at the AIFF AGM in Mumbai, Patel had finally agreed to constitute a committee to look into the matter.

The three-member committee was asked to submit their report in three months.

Topics talked about on this article



Source hyperlink

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

close