Entertainment

Nonetheless Johnny Depp’s defamation case ends, Amber Heard has already misplaced within the court docket of public opinion


As an alleged sufferer of home abuse, Amber Heard has a brand new downside.

She is dropping within the court docket of public opinion. Her ex-husband, Johnny Depp, is suing her for $50 million. The defamation case, set to renew May 16, has been ugly from the get-go as each events have graphically detailed allegations they declare to have suffered from the opposite.

He says she put a cigarette out on his cheek and hurled a bottle that severed a fingertip. She says he slapped her and performed a “cavity search” whereas manically looking for cocaine he believed she was hiding inside her physique.

I’ve by no means seen two celebrities in larger want of Ellie.

We mere mortals are sometimes riddled with envy after we think about the life of the wealthy and well-known. Watching this case will remedy you of that. There was a second final week after I kissed my tuna sandwich and thanked God for being poor after listening to those two recount their poisonous relationship.

Sure, my spouse and I could squabble on occasion.

But no person is ransacking vaginas or dropping fingers.

Which brings us again to Amber Heard’s new downside: Credibility.

Yes, there are folks in her nook. But primarily based on social media, particularly TikTok posts, Depp is clearly “winning.” Most observers now imagine he’s the actual sufferer. Heard has been solid into the function of villain.

Or as Variety reported this week: “A bizarre and disturbing trend has swept across TikTok over the last several days: Dozens of posts on the short-form video service — some amassing millions of views — have used video or audio from Amber Heard’s wrenching testimony in the Johnny Depp trial, with the creators of the videos dramatically reenacting (sic) it, performing dances to it or otherwise mocking her.”

Ms. Heard testified final week. The web jury rejected it.

It’s unusual to research this case by hashtag. #JusticeForJohnny has routinely trended throughout platforms. Meanwhile, as Variety famous, movies with the hashtag “amberturd” have racked up 1.2 billion views.

The consensus is obvious: Johnny good, Amber dangerous.

She might need a decrease approval score than Vladimir Putin.

This might clarify why Heard fired and changed her PR crew on the eve of testifying, which itself shouldn’t be precisely sensible PR. Right or fallacious, Ms. Heard senses public sentiment is stacked in opposition to her and he or she’s about to serve a life sentence for false accusations. In the #MeToo period, she might find yourself demolishing the “believe all women” edict as a result of she shouldn’t be plausible.

Again, I wasn’t there. I’m not Team Depp or Team Heard. I do suppose he ought to follow Mountain Dew as a result of something stronger appears to spook the gremlins working riot in his cranium.

But substance abuse could be very totally different from home abuse.

And the proof offered to this point means that, on the very least, Ms. Heard was additionally an abuser. Media tales this week have characterised the TikTok development of ridiculing her testimony as “gross,” “unfair,” “creepy,” “demeaning” and “disgusting.” I’d agree — if she’s telling the reality.

I hate tacking on that “if” caveat. I don’t wish to interact within the horrific act of revictimizing a sufferer. That can be gross and disgusting. But let’s faux I used to be on that jury in Virginia. Honestly, that is what I believed after Heard’s testimony: that was one of many worst performing performances I’ve ever seen. The melodramatic thrives, the lunges at existential doom, the sobbing with no tears, the frozen facial contortions, the handy gaps in reminiscence, the group theatre gesticulation — all of it lacked credibility.

She was saying stuff that must be chilling. But she seemed like she was doing a desk learn and hadn’t correctly dedicated to the script. Now, perhaps her ordeal with Depp was so traumatic that it has turned knowledgeable actress right into a horrible actress. I don’t know. All I’m saying is, if I have been a juror, I’d be alarmed by her testimony not for the allegations contained therein, however as a result of it seemed like she was mendacity by way of her enamel.

That’s to not say it is a slam-dunk for Depp. The burden of proof in any defamation case is difficult. This one is particularly tough since Depp is suing over a 2018 op-ed Heard wrote for the Washington Post during which she claimed to be a sufferer of home abuse however by no means talked about him by title. Still, he claims that column put a storm cloud over his character that has translated into dropping film roles and, in the end, his profession. She should additionally really feel reputational hurt as a result of she is countersuing for $100 million.

That’s a whole lot of potential damages from two claims which have already diminished each events. A correct autopsy should wait till all of the sordid mud settles. I’m simply glad this marriage didn’t finish in a murder-suicide.

But defamation circumstances can wreak havoc lengthy earlier than the decision arrives.

And within the court docket of public opinion, Amber Heard has already misplaced.

JOIN THE CONVERSATION

Conversations are opinions of our readers and are topic to the Code of Conduct. The Star doesn’t endorse these opinions.




Source hyperlink

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.