Johnny Depp’s Legal professionals Deny Social Media Influenced Jury, #MeToo Influence – The Hollywood Reporter

Johnny Depp’s attorneys refute that the end result within the actor’s defamation trial in opposition to Amber Heard will influence the #MeToo motion and home violence victims coming ahead, whereas additionally denying an announcement made by Heard’s attorneys that social media across the televised trial swayed the jury.

Camille Vasquez and Ben Chew, who represented Depp within the trial, appeared on Good Morning America and Today Wednesday morning for separate interviews in regards to the trial’s end result. While showing on Today and chatting with Savannah Guthrie, who disclosed on the high of the interview that her husband had consulted with Depp’s crew for the case, Vasquez responded to whether or not they fearful that the decision would discourage different victims of abuse from coming ahead.

Vasquez mentioned they have been “here to talk about the case that we tried.” 

I mean, frankly, we don’t worry,” she continued.We encourage all victims to come forward and have their day in court, which is exactly what happened in this case.” 

She gave an identical response on Good Morning America, however elaborated additional. “Domestic violence doesn’t have a gender,” she mentioned. “We believe that the verdict speaks for itself, the facts are what they were, the jury made a unanimous decision based on those facts.”

When chatting with Today’s Guthrie, Chew said that he and Vasquez had “ultimate confidence in Johnny and the jury and the facts of this case.” That consists of whether or not social media could have swayed the decision. Heard’s lawyer argued final week that the jury members, who weren’t sequestered, have been influenced of their resolution by social media across the trial, turning the case right into a “zoo.”

“How can you not [see it]?” Bredehoft advised Today. “[The jury] went home every night. They have families. The families are on social media. We had a 10-day break in the middle because of the judicial conference. There’s no way they couldn’t have been influenced by it. And it was horrible. It really, really was lopsided. It’s like the Roman Colosseum.”

Chew known as the assertion “disappointing” and argued the decide within the case was “very fair to both sides.”

“I think that was very disappointing to hear that and to hear her impugn the character of the jury and the evidence came in that should come in,” he mentioned, later including, “I don’t think there’s any reason to believe that the jurors violated their oath.” 

It is everywhere,” Vasquez added in regards to the assist for her shopper on-line, which Guthrie evidenced by way of TikTok numbers exhibiting 20 billion views within the #JusticeforDepp hashtag on TikTok to Heard’s 27 million for her opposing hashtag. “But at the same time, they were admonished every single night, and they had a tremendous amount of respect, I think, for the court and the process, and they were doing the best that they could.”

Guthrie challenged that summation of Depp’s win, noting that the jury additionally discovered the actor answerable for defamation over statements printed within the Daily Mail by his lawyer, Adam Waldman, who accused Heard of “staging a scene in furtherance of an abuse hoax,” the Today co-host mentioned. When requested how Depp’s crew can “square” that discovering, Vasquez denied the decision wasn’t “overwhelmingly positive” for Depp. 

“I think that’s just the verdict is overwhelmingly positive for Johnny, and it was unanimous,” she added. “There were seven people that decided he was defamed.”

Later, when Guthrie questioned the duo about claims of a social media marketing campaign in opposition to Heard orchestrated by Depp, Vasquez known as it “categorically false.” Chew described the allegation as “utterly baseless” and “absolutely absurd.”

“In fact, very early in the case, the prior Chief Judge White had thrown out count and counterclaims that related to that,” he added.  

As for why there have been opposing rulings within the U.S. case, which concerned defamation claims between Heard and Depp instantly, versus the U.Okay. case the place Depp misplaced his libel declare that British tabloid The Sun had defamed him when calling him a spouse beater of their reporting, Vasquez said that “the overwhelming evidence that was presented in this case in Virginia far exceeded what was presented in the U.K.”

In an announcement offered to The Hollywood Reporter, a spokesperson for Heard responded to Vasquez and Chew’s morning present appearances: “It is as unseemly as it is unprofessional that Johnny Depp’s legal team has chosen to do a victory lap for setting back decades of how women can be treated in the courtroom. What’s next? A movie deal and merchandising?”

Heard and her lawyer have introduced they plan to enchantment the decision requiring the actress to pay Depp $10 million, a determine Bredehoft mentioned the actress “absolutely” couldn’t afford. When requested on GMA about these plans, Chew advised the outlet the case was about Depp’s repute, not cash.

“This was never about money for Mr. Depp,” he mentioned. “This was about restoring his reputation, and he’s done that.”

Source hyperlink

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.