Attorneys for actor Johnny Depp started their questioning of Amber Heard within the couple’s defamation trial on Monday and challenged the Aquaman star’s claims that she suffered bodily abuse earlier than and through their temporary marriage.
Mr Depp’s attorneys launched pictures of Ms Heard making public appearances on purple carpets and The James Corden Show shortly after instances that she mentioned Mr Depp had struck her along with his palms, on which he normally wore heavy rings.
The photos proven to jurors appeared to disclose no accidents. Ms Heard mentioned the hurt, which included what she thought was a damaged nostril, was not extreme sufficient to be seen or was coated up by make-up.
Mr Depp (58) is suing Ms Heard (36) for €52 million ($50 million), saying she defamed him when she claimed she was a sufferer of home abuse. Ms Heard has countersued for €104 million ($100 million), arguing that Mr Depp smeared her by calling her a liar.
At the beginning of cross-examination of Ms Heard, an lawyer for Mr Depp requested Ms Heard if she had abused Mr Depp and was additional harming him with false allegations.
“I could never hurt Johnny,” Ms Heard mentioned.
Earlier, Ms Heard informed jurors that she filed for divorce from Mr Depp in 2016 as a result of she fearful she wouldn’t survive bodily abuse by him. She mentioned she realised the connection was past restore after he threw a cellphone that hit her within the face.
“I knew I had to leave him,” she mentioned. “I knew I wouldn’t survive it if I didn’t.”
“I made the decision to file for divorce,” she mentioned. “It was hard because I loved Johnny so much.”
The pair wed in February 2015 and their divorce was finalised about two years later.
Mr Depp has testified that he by no means hit Ms Heard and argued that she was the abuser of their relationship. He mentioned she threw a vodka bottle at him in early 2015, severing the highest of his proper center finger.
Ms Heard mentioned she didn’t trigger the finger harm and mentioned she solely hit him to defend herself or her sister.
She additionally denied Ms Depp’s allegation that she had left faeces in a mattress at one in every of his houses following a combat on her birthday. A safety guard had testified that Heard informed him the faeces had been a “horrible practical joke”.
Heard mentioned she didn’t commit any prank that day, including that she was “not in a pranking mood”.
“I had just been attacked on my 30th birthday by my husband, with whom I was desperately in love and knew I needed to leave,” she mentioned.
The authorized case centres on a December 2018 opinion piece by Ms Heard that appeared within the Washington Post. The article by no means talked about Mr Depp by identify, however his lawyer informed jurors it was clear Ms Heard was referencing him.
Mr Depp, as soon as amongst Hollywood’s largest stars, mentioned Ms Heard’s allegations price him “everything”. A brand new Pirates of the Caribbean film was placed on maintain, and Mr Depp was changed within the Fantastic Beasts movie franchise, a Harry Potter spin-off.
Ms Heard’s attorneys have argued that she informed the reality and that her opinion was protected free speech beneath the US structure’s First Amendment.
Closing arguments are scheduled for May twenty seventh.
Less than two years in the past, Mr Depp misplaced a libel case towards the Sun, a British tabloid that labelled him a “wife beater”. A London excessive courtroom decide dominated that he had repeatedly assaulted Ms Heard.