News

Expert talks impact of SCOTUS decision on NY gun law in Maryland

A local law expert weighed in on the Thursday Supreme Court ruling on guns could have a ripple effect that reaches Maryland. It is important to note that Maryland’s law isn’t affected by this ruling. The law will remain in place for the time being, but it is very similar to the New York law, so many feel it’s just a matter of time before the state’s is struck down too. “The New York law is the only one that struck down Thursday but the death knell for the dozens of similar laws you can almost hear it in the distance,” University of Baltimore School of Law Professor Michael Meyerson said.The groundbreaking decision from the Supreme Court on gun control, ruling New York’s law, that requires a good reason before someone can carry a gun outside their home, is unconstitutional.|REALTED: Maryland lawmakers react to SCOTUS decision “It’s no longer enough for a state like New York or Maryland to say, ‘We need this law to stop people from killing each other, we need this law for peace.’ Instead, the Supreme Court said unless you can find an historical analogy, something that was done in the 1800s that is similar to your law, we will not uphold it,” Meyerson said.Meyerson said that means the future of Maryland’s gun control law is in jeopardy. Maryland’s law is very similar to New York’s and a challenge to it is already working its way through the judicial system. “To the legislature and the attorney general, crack open your history books — the Supreme Court has a new standard if it wasn’t done back then we can’t do it now. So, therefore, we have to know our history: What was done in the 1800s? We must be creative coming up with analogies,” he said.Meyerson said the ruling only deals with ownership of guns, not sales or registration, so there are still some areas where legislators have control. But the ruling is coming on the heels of mass shootings like the one in Buffalo, New York and Uvalde, Texas, that have put the spotlight on gun control.”There’s skeptics on the Supreme Court that these laws never do any good,” Meyerson said. “Normally there’s what we call balancing, in other words, we’ll allow limitations on constitutional rights, free speech, if there’s really an important compelling reason. Now, we’re told that’s not what we do for guns. Guns are different.”The state senate president and house speaker are both responding, saying in part: “We will be reviewing the opinion and, if necessary, pass legislation that protects Marylanders and complies with this brand-new precedent.”The attorney general’s office is also reviewing the ruling.

A local law expert weighed in on the Thursday Supreme Court ruling on guns could have a ripple effect that reaches Maryland.

It is important to note that Maryland’s law isn’t affected by this ruling. The law will remain in place for the time being, but it is very similar to the New York law, so many feel it’s just a matter of time before the state’s is struck down too.

“The New York law is the only one that struck down Thursday but the death knell for the dozens of similar laws you can almost hear it in the distance,” University of Baltimore School of Law Professor Michael Meyerson said.

The groundbreaking decision from the Supreme Court on gun control, ruling New York’s law, that requires a good reason before someone can carry a gun outside their home, is unconstitutional.

|REALTED: Maryland lawmakers react to SCOTUS decision

“It’s no longer enough for a state like New York or Maryland to say, ‘We need this law to stop people from killing each other, we need this law for peace.’ Instead, the Supreme Court said unless you can find an historical analogy, something that was done in the 1800s that is similar to your law, we will not uphold it,” Meyerson said.

Meyerson said that means the future of Maryland’s gun control law is in jeopardy. Maryland’s law is very similar to New York’s and a challenge to it is already working its way through the judicial system.

“To the legislature and the attorney general, crack open your history books — the Supreme Court has a new standard if it wasn’t done back then we can’t do it now. So, therefore, we have to know our history: What was done in the 1800s? We must be creative coming up with analogies,” he said.

Meyerson said the ruling only deals with ownership of guns, not sales or registration, so there are still some areas where legislators have control.

But the ruling is coming on the heels of mass shootings like the one in Buffalo, New York and Uvalde, Texas, that have put the spotlight on gun control.

“There’s skeptics on the Supreme Court that these laws never do any good,” Meyerson said. “Normally there’s what we call balancing, in other words, we’ll allow limitations on constitutional rights, free speech, if there’s really an important compelling reason. Now, we’re told that’s not what we do for guns. Guns are different.”

The state senate president and house speaker are both responding, saying in part: “We will be reviewing the opinion and, if necessary, pass legislation that protects Marylanders and complies with this brand-new precedent.”

The attorney general’s office is also reviewing the ruling.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.